DM to attend Russia-NATO council meeting
whoyg2465 | 10 November, 2009 20:58
MOSCOW - Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov
said Wednesday he would visit NATO headquarters in
Brussels next week to
pearl
strand attend the first session of the new
NATO-Russian Council.
NATO declared Russia a limited partner at Tuesday's
summit at a military base near Rome, attended by
leaders of 19 alliance members and Russia. The new
council will have Russia and NATO jointly tackling
such issues as crisis management, peacekeeping,
search-and-rescue operations and joint exercises.
"It's more than just reaching a decision together,
it also means that everybody is committed to
implementing these decisions together," British
Maj. Gen. Peter Williams, head of the newly opened
NATO mission in Moscow, said on Echo of Moscow
radio Wednesday.
Under the
biwa pearl new arrangement, NATO and Russia will
decide only on those issues on which they can find
consensus; more contentious issues will be left off
their agenda, and NATO will keep a free hand in
setting and implementing policy.
Many Russians have remained wary of NATO, created a
half-century ago to contain the Soviet Union, and
some hard-liners assailed the deal with NATO as
just an illusion of closer cooperation - pointing
at the fact that Russia will have no right to veto
the alliance's decisions.
Williams sought to downplay such concerns, saying
the new council would work to reach a consensus.
"It's a search for consensus, and when there is no
consensus, it's not a case of there being a veto,
it's a case of there being an absence of
consensus," he said.
"In NATO we don't have vetoes, we simply have an
inability to reach a consensus," Williams said.
Ivanov, who spoke to reporters after his talks with
Gen. Gustav Hagglund of Finland, chairman of the
European Union's permanent Military Committee,
didn't comment on the agenda for the first session
of the Russia-NATO Council set for next Thursday.
Ivanov said he was unaware of any NATO proposals
for a joint military operations with Russia in
addition to
pearl
strand wholesale the ongoing peacekeeping
missions in the Balkans.
DM: Moscow may accept US operation in Iraq
whoyg2465 | 10 November, 2009 20:57
MOSCOW - Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov
said Moscow would put aside its opposition to a
U.S. military operation against Iraq if Washington
provides evidence that Baghdad has weapons of mass
destruction.
"Moscow's position regarding a military operation
against Iraq will depend on the information given
to
potato
pearl us by the American side about Baghdad's
possession of weapons of mass destruction," the
Interfax news agency quoted Ivanov as saying
Wednesday in Washington, where he arrived for talks
with U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and
Secretary of State Colin Powell.
However, he said such information could only be
confirmed or disproved "on the spot," according to
Interfax and the ITAR-Tass news agency.
Iraq surprised the world this week by consenting to
invite back United Nations weapons inspectors after
a nearly four-year absence.
Ivanov said the first group of 43 inspectors would
depart for Iraq this week. However, U.N. officials
have said arrangements for the return of inspectors
would be completed only by Oct. 6.
Washington is pushing for a new U.N. Security
Council resolution on Iraq that would set a
deadline for the return of inspectors and threaten
consequences if Iraq doesn't cooperate. However,
Russia says there is no need for a new resolution
and that inspectors could deploy swiftly.
Ivanov said that once there, the inspectors could
complete their task quickly.
"I believe that one month will be enough for the
inspectors to determine whether the production of
weapons of mass destruction exists in Iraq or not,"
Interfax and ITAR-Tass quoted him as saying.
A former top Russian defense ministry official,
retired Col. Gen. Leonid Ivashov, predicted
Thursday that the United States would launch an
attack on Iraq despite opposition from Russia and
other countries. Ivashov warned that with the
United States taking control over Iraq's oil
resources, world oil prices will plummet to
twisted
pearl necklace the detriment of Russia, the
world's second-largest oil exporter.
The chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in
Russia's lower parliament house, Dmitry Rogozin,
said the return of inspectors to Iraq would not
"cancel the U.S. thesis that the regime of Saddam
Hussein must be done away with," the Interfax news
agency reported. But Rogozin said that if
inspectors are able to do their job freely,
America's allies will have no reason to support
military action.
Moscow has long been a strong ally of Baghdad and
fears a U.S. strike could threaten its economic
interests in Iraq, which owes Moscow dlrs 7 billion
in Soviet-era debt.
Ivanov, in Washington as part of a series of
meetings on security cooperation agreed in May by
U.S. President George W. Bush and Russian President
Vladimir Putin, also defended Russia's cooperation
with Iran and North Korea. Those countries, along
with Iraq, have been singled out by Bush as an
"axis of evil" for their attempts to obtain weapons
of mass destruction.
Ivanov said that Moscow provides Tehran only with
"defensive weapons," including anti-tank weapons,
small arms, armored personnel carriers and air
defense systems, Interfax reported.
"These types of weapons cannot be of a
destabilizing character," he said, adding that
there had been no talk of supplying offensive
weapons to
akoya
pearl necklace Iran.
Regarding North Korea, Ivanov said Russia's
military cooperation with that country was a purely
economic matter, depending solely "on the economic
possibilities of Pyongyang," according to Interfax.
"There is no political basis for bilateral
cooperation in the military sphere," Ivanov said.
DM: Russia expects US to leave C.Asia
whoyg2465 | 10 November, 2009 20:57
MOSCOW - Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov
said Tuesday that the United States should abandon
its military presence in former Soviet republics in
Central Asia once the war in Afghanistan is over
and pledged to help strengthen the Afghan army with
aircraft and military spare parts.
Ivanov said the U.S. troop deployment in Central
Asia was necessary for the success of the
anti-terrorist operation and "largely positive."
But, he added, "we proceed from the assumption that
... these bases are there on a temporary basis and
only until the end of the anti-terrorist operation."
President Vladimir Putin's decision to
freshwater
pearl earrings welcome the U.S. troops into
Central Asia dramatically bolstered Russia's
relations with the United States and other Western
countries, but has provoked concern at home.
Some representatives of Russia's political elite
have voiced fear that the United States might use
its military presence to end Russia's sway over the
region, which was conquered by the Russian Empire
in the 19th century.
"I wouldn't raise the degree of our concern to an
unnecessarily high level," Ivanov said at a news
conference, pointing to statements by U.S.
officials who have sought to allay Russia's anxiety
by saying that no permanent bases are planned.
With Russia's blessing, U.S. troops have been
deployed at an air base in Uzbekistan and at an
airport in Kyrgyzstan, and other allied forces are
expected to move to bases in Tajikistan and Kazakstan.
Ivanov said he doesn't expect the anti-terrorist
operation in Afghanistan to end quickly.
"The euphoria about crushing the organizational and
other structures of the Taliban and al-Qaida is
premature," he said. "Many terrorists and their
supporters have gone underground but they are still
there, alive and well, and will seek a chance to
show that."
Ivanov, flanked by visiting Afghan Defense Minister
Mohammed Fahim, said Russia would help bolster
Afghanistan's military capability by providing
spare parts for its Soviet-built weapons and other
assistance.
"We aren't talking about weapons, enough of which
have piled up there during 20 years of war, but
about organizational assistance, supplies and spare
parts," Ivanov said. He added that Russia was also
ready to provide training aircraft and transport
helicopters for the Afghan air force.
Ivanov said that Russia had no immediate plans to
send military experts to
pearl
necklace help train the Afghan army and wasn't
seeking to gain any influence there.
"We aren't going to enforce our will on anyone,
especially as we know the history of Afghanistan
quite well," he said. "We will provide assistance
only when we are asked for it."
Following the 1979-89 Soviet occupation of
Afghanistan, the Kremlin was a key arms supplier
for the anti-Taliban forces in the late 1990s. Last
year, Moscow supplied an estimated dlrs 34 million
worth of Soviet-era weapons to the Afghan forces
fighting the Taliban.
Do we know what we want?
whoyg2465 | 10 November, 2009 20:56
There's no quelling the calls for a national idea
for Russia – a new concept to replace the lost
belief in the radiant communist future. So far,
there's been no result, and there's unlikely to be
one any time soon, despite the abundance of
proposals, including some that are really not bad.
But what's difficult isn't finding a national idea,
what's difficult is getting society to accept it.
Russian society today is divided – to a large
extent by the collapse of its old national idea –
and it looks like this division will persist for
some years to come. Given this situation,
proclaiming some new idea the common national goal
won't be easy.
It would probably be possible to pearl
necklace come closer to this aim if the state
drew up a motivated system of policy priorities
that would be comprehensible to all. Let's look at
the main issues that could become a basis for this
choice of priorities.
• In Russia, there are 4 million people without a
roof over their heads. Most of these people are
refugees and people forced to move.
• Around 30 percent of the Russian population –
40-45 million people – have incomes lower than the
living minimum.
• The number of Russians killed as a result of
accidents, poisonings and traumatic injuries could
exceed 300,000 this year. Per 100,000 people, this
statistic is one of the highest in the world and is
growing fast. Every three hours on average, as many
people die from unnatural causes as were killed in
the Kursk submarine disaster.
• Life expectancy in Russia is around 10 years
behind that of industrially developed countries.
• Russia has the highest number of prisoners in the
world.
• Over the last few years, Russia has lost its
greatest social achievements of the 20th century –
free and accessible education and health care –
neither today are accessible without partial or
full payment.
• After the collapse of the Soviet Union, more than
20 million ethnic Russians have found themselves
outside Russia. Many of them are not happy with
their situation in the former Soviet republics and
would like to move to Russia, but they can't afford
to do so. At the same time, Russia needs immigrants
to compensate for a falling birthrate and
increasing depopulation.
• Dozens of towns and thousands of villages don't
have sewerage systems. The medieval state of their
sanitary infrastructure leads to outbreaks of
dangerous diseases. Tuberculosis, which was once
considered beaten, has reached epidemic
proportions, while cases of viral hepatitis have
increased and so have cases of AIDS.
Add to freshwater
pearl earrings this the war in Chechnya, which
has now become a partisan war, making it difficult
to see how it will end. Also on the list would have
to be the $150 billion foreign debt which cripples
the Russian economy. Then there is the worn-out
state of technology and constructions, which
systematically leads to accidents with loss of
life. And there's the sorry plight of the
scientific and technical potential created in the
past – it's impossible to keep it all as it was,
but it would be a terrible loss to see it all go.
Much more could be added to this list. But it
already contains enough points to show that the
essential problems facing Russia differ from those
that occupy the authorities and take up the
public's attention.
People argue until they're foaming at the mouth
about restoring the statue of Felix Dzerzhinsky
toppled in 1991, or about a new national anthem,
though the current one was adopted not so long ago.
There's an ongoing fight to limit governors' powers
and beef up the authority of the seven
"governor-generals." Passions rage over ownership
rights of some TV companies.
It would be unfair to say the government isn't
doing anything important and desperately needed. It
is doing plenty that is useful. Getting through a
deficit-free budget for 2001, attempts to reduce
the foreign debt, raising pensions, tax reform and
important decisions on military reform are all
steps that will bring Russia closer to the economic
conditions that will overcome poverty and resolve
many social problems.
But at the same time, there are problems that
society and the state so stubbornly ignore, raising
the question as to whether they don't notice these
problems because they don't want to notice them.
This goes for the difficult situation of refugees,
creating incentives to attract immigrants to
Russia, the very high mortality rate, especially
from unnatural causes, and many other issues.
In defense of the authorities, one could say that
their efforts to strengthen the state and bring
order – as people love to akoya
pearl necklace say in Russia – are supposed to
ensure the very conditions that will enable these
priority tasks to be solved.
If only this could be believed. All too often we
see officials whose tireless efforts in
strengthening the state lead one to think that
they're not so much strengthening the state as
strengthening their own power and making themselves
less accountable to society. They're ready to spend
an eternity doing this, while the time will never
come for state officials to tackle the real
problems facing Russia.
|
Do you want Rambo as your firm's CEO?
whoyg2465 | 10 November, 2009 20:56
An article by Jim Collins of Management Research
Laboratory in Colorado in January's Harvard
Business Review takes a rather innovative look at
leadership styles and qualities in business. It
rejects the idea that business leaders must be
larger-than-life figures – currently in fashion –
and advocates humility and modesty.
Since Lee Iacocca's divine descent, CEOs have put
greater effort into casting themselves as
Hollywood-style icons than as managers and
corporate movers. As company chiefs earn hundreds
of millions in salaries and share options, they
have come to
twisted
pearl necklace think of themselves as macho
figures – a fact typified by Disney's recent
sacking its CEO after his first 17 months: After
getting fired, the guy still bagged more than $70
million in compensation.
There are some exceptions, of course. Some CEOs
take responsibility for their company's actions and
failures. Last year, for instance, in the United
States, when defective Bridgestone tires caused
many accidents with Ford Explorers, the chairman of
Ford Motor Co. took to the airwaves to reinforce
consumer confidence and accept some of the blame.
Similarly, when United Airlines pilots forced the
cancellation of thousands of flights during the
holiday season, its CEO went public to apologize.
But these are rare acts. CEOs in today's world bask
in the spotlight of good times and hide inside
their corporate castles when things go sour. These
days, corporate chiefs prefer glamour to grit.
• Psychology
In his article, Collins explores the psychology of
leadership and concludes that humble,
behind-the-scenes players are more effective than
those who are too busy polishing their own images.
Those who pat themselves on the back for public
displays of toughness are often too distracted by
their own reflections to be good managers. Or, as
Collins puts it: "It's hard to imagine a good
business leader thinking, ‘Hey, that Rambo
character reminds me of me.'"
This case may be even more acute in Russia, where
the gangster-image has particular appeal. For
instance, I recently sat through a meeting to
restructure a multimillion-dollar loan granted by a
Western consortium to a Russian company. The crux
of the matter was that the Russians had defaulted.
Yet, the Russian bankers showed up in their Armani
suits, and I calculated that if we could just strip
them naked and sell their jackets and ties, we
could pay at least one year's interest on the loan.
Last year, when my company organized the first-ever
forum bringing together Russian legislators and
foreign CEOs, more lawmakers showed up than one
usually sees in the State Duma. After a day of
intense discussion, interaction and debate, it was
obvious that short notice and lack of organization
had left some people exhausted. At the end of the
meeting, I took the microphone, thanked the
moderator (my good friend Vladimir Ryzhkov – out of
favor nowadays for being in opposition to
potato pearl the
Kremlin) and made a personal apology for the
shortcomings, taking all the blame myself.
While the foreign CEOs smiled benevolently, a
well-meaning Russian CEO approached me with a look
of horror on his face. "Whatever you do, never take
the blame for someone else's mistake," he told me.
I found it hard to explain to him that, as a CEO,
that is precisely what you do.
The job of a CEO, a true business leader, is to set
up successors for even more greatness. Only people
with personal complexes and unfulfilled ambitions
would try to shine through a company event and try
to overshadow subordinates. A true business leader
must come forward when it is time to take the blame
and put his team forward when the petals are showered.
Collins is absolutely correct when he concludes
that some of the most important attributes of
leadership are modesty, shunning public adulation
and never being boastful.
In Russia, businessmen should take particular note
of this. After all, this is a country where a CEO
can get killed or become the target of extortion –
unless, of course, he's also a hood.
True, there are many business leaders here made of
talent, knowledge and good working habits. Of late,
I've come across a growing number of Russian
self-made entrepreneurs and CEOs who are highly
disciplined, focused and maintain a high standard
of conduct. They can claim a place among the
world's enlightened business elites and deserve
every dollar on their expense accounts and platinum
cards (which, I might note, are not issued in
Western Samoa or the Bahamas, but by legitimate
banks in New York or the City of London.) But they
make up a small proportion of the Russian business
community. Nevertheless, one common trait unites
most of them – arrogance.
• National traits
Inasmuch as national traits filter into business
practices, take a look at CEOs of Indian origin as
a counterexample. Natural humility plays an
important role there. Indians have a powerful
diaspora today, but its most prosperous members are
often the most quiet. Vinod Khosla, recently named
the greatest venture capitalist on the planet by
Forbes and Red Herring magazines, is as quiet as a
Rolls Royce engine. With none of the fanfare and
glamour associated with wealth, one could be in the
presence of an Indian billionaire and hardly notice
his presence. It is surprising how many of them
there are out there. In Santa Clara in Silicon
Valley, an Indian entrepreneur, Kanwal Rekhi (net
worth more than $300 million), started a club that
is now a common meeting place for business people
and managers of Indian ethnicity. After one such
meeting, a shocked American industry insider
whispered to me, "Do you know how much wealth was
in that room just now; I just counted a net total
worth of $5 billion!" Yet it was a quiet, modest
gathering that had the sobriety of an Indian temple
or prayer meeting.
I once had a discussion about the importance of
humility in business with Scott Blacklin, the
former head of the American Chamber of Commerce in
Russia. He asked me why I thought many Indians,
despite their impoverished backgrounds, did so
well. "For the same reason Gandhi stood up to
pearl strand
wholesale Churchill," I said. "Because they are
fiercely competitive and humble. People
underestimate them because of their unthreatening
demeanor and looks. They mistake their humility for
weakness, while many of them have enormous hidden
talents and leadership skills." Blacklin agreed
while accepting my invitation to speak at a forum.
A week later, at the forum, a thousand guests
waited as Blacklin's name was repeatedly announced.
It turns out he had never showed. He never bothered
to explain why, and many guests and speakers still
remember that one act of arrogance on his part,
forgetting all other talents and skills he's displayed.
• Meanwhile …
In this same spirit, I have to admit that not only
have I received plenty of anonymous hate mail and
messages of support, but also some very
well-meaning advice from readers and businesspeople
about our advertisements concerning the Moscow
Times. First, I thank all those who have written or
made their opinions known. I have to admit that the
ad, one of many planned, which points out that the
daily newspaper publishes month-old stories, was
probably not really needed. Readers are intelligent
enough to see such things for themselves. And, in
an information drought, people have no choice but
to pick-up whatever crap the only English-language
daily in town throws at them.
I have been asked to make a better case exposing
the Times and its parent company – especially about
the unfair business practices and bare-knuckle
tactics the Times has used against us – rather than
publishing negative ads. As many of you will
notice, we've withdrawn the ad and we shall focus
our firepower on the kind of stories that have
rattled the snake pit. As for those sending hate
mail, I only have two things to say: a) They are
not hard to trace and b) Thank you, and I hope you
like the fireworks that are about to come.
***
I am flattered that so many readers have actually
liked my column. Such support is welcome, given
that one of my former Australian colleagues thinks
that I should be shot for my atrocious English and
never be allowed anywhere near the paper. To
pearl
strand answer one reader's queries: No, I don't
have an Ivy School degree in management; no, I have
no literary education. In fact, I am barely
literate and I write this column in 15 minutes
flat. In all humility, I must say that I alone take
credit for its brilliance. The blame for anything
that is wrong must go to my copy editor, Raffi. His
e-mail address is raffik@russiajournal.com, and
please direct your anger toward him.
Congratulations!
whoyg2465 | 13 October, 2009 02:17
If you can read this post, it means that the registration process was successful and that you can start blogging